Physical morbidity in elderly psychiatric inpatients: prevalence and possible relations between the major mental disorders and physical illness

Author(s):  
Dimitrios Adamis ◽  
Chris Ball
1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 829-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Fink

SynopsisOn the basis of nationwide patient register data the diagnostic pattern of the medical admissions of a general population (17–49 year-olds; N = 30427) during an 8-year period was studied by comparing those individuals who had been admitted to the psychiatric department (i.e. psychiatric patients) with those individuals who had not. The results suggest that the high utilization of medical admissions by psychiatric patients could not be explained simply by coincident chronic physical illness or particular types of physical disease including the somatic complications of mental disorders. It is more likely to be attributable to other factors such as an increased general susceptibility to physical illness, different forms of illness behaviour, and the process of somatization.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARC DE HERT ◽  
CHRISTOPH U. CORRELL ◽  
JULIO BOBES ◽  
MARCELO CETKOVICH-BAKMAS ◽  
DAN COHEN ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 757-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Frasch ◽  
Jens Ivar Larsen ◽  
Joachim Cordes ◽  
Bent Jacobsen ◽  
Signe Olrik Wallenstein Jensen ◽  
...  

1968 ◽  
Vol 114 (516) ◽  
pp. 1365-1369 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. Maguire ◽  
K. L. Granville-Grossman

The practice of psychiatry overlaps appreciably that of the other branches of Medicine. A high incidence of psychiatric illness has been found in out-patients attending medical and surgical clinics (Shepherd, Davies and Culpan, 1960; and Davies, 1964), and among in-patients in general medical and surgical wards (Meyer and Mendelson, 1960; Fleminger and Mallett, 1962; Eilenberg, 1965; Granville-Grossman, 1967). Other studies have shown an appreciable incidence of physical illness in out-patients attending psychiatric clinics (Davies, 1965), in psychiatric in-patients in a teaching hospital (Marshall, 1949; and Herridge, 1960), and in patients with mental disturbance attending general practitioners (Shepherd, Cooper, Brown and Kalton, 1964, 1966). The extent to which ordinary psychiatric in-patient practice involves dealing with non-psychiatric problems does not appear to have been extensively studied, although Davies, D. W. (1964) has indicated the presence of considerable physical morbidity within a psychiatric hospital population. We here describe an investigation into the incidence of physical morbidity among in-patients admitted to a general hospital psychiatric unit with a total responsibility to a catchment area population of 90,000, and into some of the factors affecting this incidence.


2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Patel ◽  
Betty R. Kirkwood ◽  
Sulochana Pednekar ◽  
Helen Weiss ◽  
David Mabey

BackgroundThe determinants of common mental disorders in women have not been described in longitudinal studies from a low-income country.MethodPopulation-based cohort study of 2494 women aged 18 to 50 years, in India. The Revised Clinical Interview Schedule was used for the detection of common mental disorders.ResultsThere were 39 incident cases of common mental disorder in 2166 participants eligible for analysis (12-month rate 1.8%, 95% CI 1.3–2.4%). The following baseline factors were independently associated with the risk for common mental disorder: poverty (low income and having difficulty making ends meet); being married as compared with being single; use of tobacco; experiencing abnormal vaginal discharge; reporting a chronic physical illness; and having higher psychological symptom scores at baseline.ConclusionsProgrammes to reduce the burden of common mental disorder in women should target poorer women, women with chronic physical illness and who have gynaecological symptoms, and women who use tobacco.


2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 547-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary M. Kasow ◽  
Robert S. Weisskirch

For individuals with mental illness, others' perceptions of mental illness often limit integration into communities. Perceptions of mental illness manifest as social stigma in the form of social distance and may depend on individuals' attributions of the origins of mental illness. 180 university students completed a survey on attribution of mental illness and social distance across several disorders (psychiatric and physical). Participants indicated greater social distance for severe mental illness (i.e., schizophrenia) than less severe mental illness and physical illness. More desire for social distance may be related to unfamiliarity with severe mental illness rather than less severe mental and physical illnesses. Greater understanding of how individuals perceive mental illness can inform efforts to educate the public.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document